Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
Search
Close

Retirement Plan News

Plan News You Can Use

Asset Protection / IRA / Regulatory News / Retirement Assets in Bankruptcy

Supreme Court: Inherited IRAs Not Exempt from Bankruptcy

June 18, 2014June 25, 2014 RetirementNews

In a unanimous decision handed down on June 12, 2014 in the case of Clark v. Rameker, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an Inherited IRA does not fall under the exemption afforded to retirement accounts under the Bankruptcy Code and is included in bankruptcy estate.

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 provided a great deal of protection to assets designated as retirement funds. IRAs, traditional and Roth, received a $1 Million inflation-adjusted exemption, while funds originating from employer-sponsored retirement programs received unlimited protection from creditors.

Up until this point, the courts have split in their treatment of Inherited IRAs. Some held that so long as funds are ‘retirement funds’ held in an account exempt from taxation it was out of reach of judgment creditors. Other courts sided with creditors denying exemption under the reasoning that Inherited IRAs are entirely different from traditional and Roth IRAs (different rules for distribution and taxation) and lack a clear retirement purpose as their funds could be accessed at any time by the beneficiary.

What Happened

The case involved an Inherited IRA account with about $300,000. Ruth Heffron established an IRA in 2000, which was Inherited a year later by her daughter Heidi Heffron-Clark. In 2010 the beneficiary of the Inherited IRA and her husband filed for a bankruptcy. In their petition, they claimed that the Inherited IRA was not to be a part of the bankruptcy estate. The trustee and creditors of the estate disagreed with that assertion on the grounds that Inherited IRA moneys were not retirement funds.

The Bankruptcy Court sided with the creditors in their 2011 ruling, which was overturned by the US District Court the following year under the reasoning that since the funds were originally  saved for retirement they qualified for the exemption. In 2013, that decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals stating that there was a difference between IRAs which were Inherited and the ones which were not. The Supreme Court agreed with the court of appeals upholding their decision.

What the Court Said

Justice Sotomayor, who wrote the opinion, stated that Inherited IRAs are not retirement funds for three reasons:

  • New contributions are not allowed to Inherited IRAs;
  • Holders of Inherited IRA accounts are required to withdraw money from them, no matter how close or far they are from retirement;
  • Distributions from Inherited IRAs are not subject to the 10% premature distribution penalty and can be withdrawn at any time for any purpose;

The Justice further noted that the result was consistent with the purposes of the Bankruptcy Code and its balancing of the interests of creditors and debtors. Reading the retirement fund provision in a different manner  would be equivalent to giving debtors a ‘free pass’ and not a ‘fresh start’ intended by the exemption of the Code.

It is tough to argue with that reasoning.

What It May Mean from Now on

This development puts a greater emphasis on asset protection considerations for beneficiary designations and not primarily on tax attributes which arguably played a greater role before the June decision.

  • IRA account holders will look to their advisors for help in evaluating risks and rewards when selecting IRA beneficiaries other than their spouse. It will be important to review current beneficiary designations to determine is any changes are in order.
  • Spousal beneficiaries will need assistance in examining the merits and risks of treating the Inherited IRAs as their own or designating them as Inherited IRAs. There is uncertainly whether IRA assets inherited by a spouse will be treated as retirement funds or inherited funds.
  • Trusts as beneficiary of IRAs may become a more popular option although the rules are complex and a careful risk/reward and cost/benefit analysis will be necessary.
  • Some states may choose to act now and offer a level of protection to Inherited IRAs at the state level as the Court’s decision addressed federal bankruptcy rules. Currently, eight states protect Inherited IRAs in bankruptcy: Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Individual retirement account, inherited IRA, IRA, Retirement, supreme court

Post navigation

Previous Post
Simple Wins by Design
Next Post
Treasury Opens Doors for Longevity Annuities in Retirement Accounts

about

Recent Posts

  • Plan Sponsor Relief in the April 29 DOL Announcement
  • Consulting Through Uncertain Times: Retirement Plan Issues During COVID-19 Pandemic
  • CARES Act: Here’s What Retirement Account Provisions are in the Senate Bill
  • Retirement Plan Relief Ideas Before the Lawmakers
  • SECURE Act: Increased New Plan Startup Tax Credit & New Tax Credit for Auto-enrollment
  • What Expenses May be Paid Out of Plan Assets?
  • SECURE ACT: Key Provisions in Brief

Archives

  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • July 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • January 2012

Categories

  • 401(k)
  • 403(b)
  • Asset Protection
  • Business acquisition
  • CARES Act
  • Cash Balance
  • Compliance
  • Davis Bacon
  • Deadlines
  • Defined Benefit
  • Defined Contribution
  • DOL
  • FAB
  • Fiduciary
  • Form 5500
  • Income security
  • IRA
  • IRS
  • MEP
  • Owner-only Plan
  • PBGC
  • PEP
  • Plan Design
  • Plan Fees
  • Prevailing Wage
  • Regulatory News
  • Retirement Assets in Bankruptcy
  • Retirement Income
  • Retirement Practice
  • RMD
  • Roth IRA
  • Safe Harbor
  • SECURE Act
  • Self-employed
  • SIMPLE IRA
  • Solo(cb)
  • Solo(k)
  • SSA
  • Student Loans
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com
Blog at WordPress.com.
Back to top
  • Follow Following
    • Retirement Plan News
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Retirement Plan News
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: